See something we could improve on this page? Give website feedback.
The City of Portland ordains.
Section 1. The Council finds:
- Oregon lawmakers passed Senate Bill (SB) 243 in June 2025 (effective September 26, 2025), also known as the Community Safety Firearms Act. In its relevant portions, SB 243 amended ORS 166.370(1)(b) and ORS 166.377(3) to revest back into the hands of local governments local control over regulations of firearms in their communities.
- SB 243 allowed local governments to decide whether to continue the exception for persons who have valid concealed handgun permits to possess firearms in public buildings used for official meetings of that local government.
- Gun violence poses a safety risk in all spaces. Across the United States, various locations where public officials and the community meetings have become targets of or venues for gun violence have become targets or venues for gun violence. Fear of violence and uncertainty of one's safety can contribute to uncertainty that healthy civil discourse can occur in the public venue.
- Political violence is also on the rise across the United States, constituting a serious risk to the safety of government officials, city employees, and members of the community who facilitate and attend public meetings in these spaces.
- In its September 2025 meeting, the Multnomah County Board of Commissioners found that the presence of firearms in public buildings, even when carried by individuals with a conceal handgun license, can contribute to a culture of fear, undermine trust and feeling of safety with the community, as well as increase the risk of accidental discharge, intimidation, or escalation during conflicts. Council concurs.
- Public officials, city staff and members of the community who gather in public meeting locations are entitled to all possible protections from gun violence in these spaces. The City is committed to ensuring that attendance and participation at official meetings held in buildings owned or controlled by the City can be as safe and welcoming as possible.
- Loaded and unloaded firearms are already prohibited in City buildings under several existing Code Sections 3.18.020.B.6, 14A.60.010.C, 14A.60.010D, and 20.12.050. Through the Code amendments shown in the accompanying Exhibits, the City's policy is that the affirmative defense in ORS 166.370(3)(g), for persons with concealed handguns licenses under ORS 166.291 and 166.292, will no longer apply to their possession of firearms in certain buildings used for City official meetings.
- As required by SB 243, the City will post clearly visible signs at all normal points of entry to the buildings and will post notice of the City's website identifying all buildings subject to this policy. The City Administrator is expected to implement the code amendments.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Council directs:
- Amend City Code Section 3.18.020 as shown in Exhibit A.
- Amend City Code Section 14A.60.010 as shown in Exhibit B
- Amend City Code Section 20.12.050 as shown in Exhibit C.
Exhibits and attachments
Impact Statement
Purpose of proposed legislation and background information
What became known as the gun omnibus bill,SB 243 was put forward to the legislature by the Senate Interim Committee on the Judiciary in Oregon's 2025 legislative session. Pursuant toit being signed into law by Governor Tina Kotek on July 24, 2025, and embedded into the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) on August 8, 2025, the new law went into effect on September 26, 2025.
With the onus on localities to pass and enactappropriate legislation within the parameters of the language of the law, the City of Portlandseeks to codify its own version of this law. Codification would prohibit bringing even licensed concealed-carry firearms into public buildings where official government meetings occur and where governing agencies have barred their possession by way of local code.
Now that state law has laid the groundwork for this to be applied in the city of Portland, we must establish the specific locations where the City seeks to ban firearms.
Financial and budgetary impacts
This will apply to three City-owned and managed buildings on a permanent basis, and as a result, we anticipate minimal financial impacts. We can expect small one-time costs for signage creation, but we have not identified any ongoing costs. There are no related MOUs, IGAs, or long-term commitments and it should not require additional staffing or equipment to enact.
Economic and real estate development impacts
This ordinance is limited in scope and does not carry any impact for the broader economic environment in the City. There is no anticipated effect to real estate development.
Community impacts and community involvement
Community members affected by this will be limited to only those serving in an official capacity on a City advisory body, and even then, the tangible impacts will be limited to creating/carrying/posting signage barring concealed carry weapons from locations and spaces where advisory bodies operate.
100% renewable goal
Not applicable
Economic and real estate development analysis
Analysis provided by Prosper Portland
An Economic and Real Estate Development Impact Analysis was not submitted for this proposed action. Pursuant to City Council Resolution 37664, Prosper Portland staff has reviewed the action and agree that it does not require an Economic and Real Estate Development Impact Analysis.
Document history
Document number: 2026-123
President's referral: Community and Public Safety Committee