95 Neighborhood Profiles Showcase Economic And Livability Issues

News Article
A colorful map illustration of the City of Portland. The map is divided into 7 district. Each district is identified by a different color and icon. Going clockwise from left to right: Turquoise district is marked with rainboots and an N for North Portland. Yellow region is marked with a bicycle icon and NE for North East Portland. Blue district is marked with donut and coffee and CNE for Central North East. Red is marked with a food truck and E for East Portland and so on.
The Office of Community & Civic Life and Portland State University Package Portland’s Economic, Social, and Livability Challenges Using a Variety of Data Sources
Published

PORTLAND, Ore.— Portland grew rapidly between 2010 and 2020 and the city is feeling the economic and livability growing pains. 2020 Census data collected during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic put Portland’s total population at 652,503 (up from 583,776 in 2010). With the City's government structure changing, data is needed to help inform Portlanders, community advocates, and elected leaders seeking solutions about ratepayer investments, public resources, social service programs and future commissioner districts.

The Office of Community & Civic Life (Civic Life) partnered with Portland State University’s Population Research Center (PSU) to collect and package data from the 2020 Census and other sources in 94 data-rich neighborhood profiles and one citywide profile. Last summer, Civic Life previewed the data-rich profiles in order to receive feedback from City employees, neighborhood associations, community groups, and individual Portlanders. Civic Life and PSU are taking that feedback to refine the profiles and build a user-friendly, searchable database that will launch later this year.

“Portland’s transition to a new form of government gives us the opportunity to rebuild it with equity at its core,” said Chief Administrative Officer Michael Jordan. “This data highlights the issues facing our communities and will help groups like the Independent District Commission, whose mandate includes defining districts by equal population, shape a government that is responsive and adaptable to the needs of all Portlanders.” 

Packaging the data this way provides a deeper look into unique neighborhood characteristics and challenges that are often overlooked.

“We have already heard that these profiles are being used by Neighborhood Associations and Districts to better focus their services,” said Civic Life Interim Director Michael Montoya. “I expect these profiles to influence bureau recommendations that go to Council, as well as other community-led initiatives.”

What Data is in the 95 Neighborhood Profiles?
Demographic data has traditionally been organized in census blocks, which do not match Portland’s 94 neighborhood boundaries. Civic Life and PSU painstakingly matched this data to neighborhood boundaries using a variety of sources to populate the profiles.

Those sources include:  

  • 2020 census;
  • American Community Survey;
  • Feeding America food insecurity data;
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Social Vulnerability Index;
  • Portlandness: A Cultural Atlas; and
  • National Center for Health Statistics Life Expectancy Estimate.

The profiles feature neighborhood characteristics and rankings for the five top and bottom variables of each neighborhood. These include population, poverty rate, English proficiency, home-ownership rate, and severely rent-burdened households, among others.

Here is a preview of what the data reports would look like ranking neighborhoods by a variety of topics. This new map tool will be available later in 2023:

Population by Neighborhood (2020)

2020 Census data puts Portland’s total population at 652,503 people (up from 583,776 in 2010). This snapshot of the data shows Portland’s five most populated and least populated neighborhoods. While building these profiles, the data revealed that more Portlanders live east of I-205 that in the entire west side of the city.

RankNeighborhoodRegionPopulation Count
1Powellhurst-GilbertEast32,852
2HazelwoodEast26,700
3CentennialEast25,413
4LentsEast22,244
5Northwest DistrictNW18,314
RankNeighborhoodRegionPopulation Count
90Arlington HeightsNW1,067
91BridgetonNorth928
92SunderlandCNE698
93Woodland ParkEast202
94Healy HeightsNW183

People Experiencing Poverty (2020)

These are the Portland neighborhoods in which people are experiencing the highest poverty rates and the lowest poverty rates.

RankNeighborhoodRegionNumber of People Experiencing PovertyPopulation CountPercentage of People Experiencing Poverty
1Powellhurst-GilbertEast6,70232,85220.4%
2HazelwoodEast4,95226,70018.5%
3CentennialEast4,12225,41316.2%
4Portland DowntownNW3,73014,16526.3%
5PortsmouthNorth3,68310,14935.8%
RankNeighborhoodRegionNumber of People Experiencing PovertyPopulation CountPercentage of People Experiencing Poverty
90Marshall ParkSW441,1993.7%
91MaplewoodSW282,8261%
92Woodland ParkEast2420211.9%
93Sylvan-HighlandNW81,4740.6%
94Healy HeightsNW31831.6%

People Experiencing Food Insecurity (2020)

These are the Portland neighborhoods in which people are experiencing the highest food insecurity rates and the lowest food insecurity rates. “Food insecurity” is a lack of access to enough food for an active, healthy life. Food insecurity can increase the risk of chronic illnesses – like diabetes, asthma, and high blood pressure – and mental health issues like anxiety and aggression.

RankNeighborhoodRegionNumber of People Experiencing Food InsecurityPopulation CountPercentage of People Experiencing Food Insecurity
1Powellhurst-GilbertEast5,74932,85217.5%
2CentennialEast3,98625,41315.7%
3HazelwoodEast3,95626,70014.8%
4LentsEast3,13622,24414.1%
5MontavillaSE2,25016,80913.4%
RankNeighborhoodRegionNumber of People Experiencing Food InsecurityPopulation CountPercentage of People Experiencing Food Insecurity
90Arlington HeightsNW321,0673%
91Sylvan-HighlandNW301,4742%
92Woodland ParkEast2220211%
93University ParkNorth217,0220.3%
94Healy HeightsNW1918310.5%

People Experiencing Social Vulnerability (2020)

These are the Portland neighborhoods in which people are experiencing the most social vulnerability and the least social vulnerability. “Social vulnerability” refers to the potential negative effects on communities and individuals caused by external stresses. These stresses include natural disasters and disease outbreaks.

RankNeighborhoodRegionResidents Experiencing Social Vulnerability
1GlenfairEast99%
2Mill ParkEast95%
3CentennialEast94%
4Powellhurst-GilbertEast93%
5HazelwoodEast87%
RankNeighborhoodRegionResidents Experiencing Social Vulnerability
90LinntonNW0.02%
91Forest ParkNW0.02%
92CrestwoodSW0.02%
93MarkhamSW0.01%
94South BurlingameSW0.004%

Neighborhood Data

You can view all 95 neighborhood profiles on our website:

95 Neighborhood Profiles

Here is a PDF preview of what the data reports would look like ranking neighborhoods by a variety of topics. This new map tool will be available later in 2023:

You can access designed high resolution JPEGs of what the data reports would look like ranking neighborhoods by a variety of topics:

Folder with High Resolution Images


Portland Engagement Project
Civic Life will host dozens of conversations across Portland this spring. The listening sessions, along with the data-rich profiles, are part of the multi-year Portland Engagement Project (PEP). PEP is an opportunity for Portlanders to help expand its existing engagement model to solve issues today and into the future.

Civic Life will announce the schedule of the PEP listening sessions later this month.

For more information, visit portland.gov/civic/portland-engagement-project.


About Civic Life 
The Office of Community & Civic Life (Civic Life) connects the people of Portland with their City government to promote the common good. Our programs create a culture of collaboration, expanding possibilities for all Portlanders to contribute their knowledge, experience, and creativity to solve local problems and make life better in the city we all share. portlandoregon.gov/civic

###